Pages

Thursday, February 9, 2017

Of Weapons and the Empty Hand

Back when I still had no training in eskrima, I had a very low opinion of swordsmen or of any martial artist who fought with weapons; thus, also eskrimadors.  I held in higher regard the skills of those who learned to fight with empty hands and kept exclusively to it.  I acknowledged it as the more difficult and greater mastery.  For how hard is it, really, to fight with weapons?

Through the years as an eskrima practitioner, however, I have had a reversal in my opinion.  For me, it still holds true that empty hand fighting techniques are more difficult to learn and are the greater mastery.  But now I also say that only those martial artists who have had training and experience with weapons can truly become masters of empty hand fighting.

You will note that there is some truth in what I say if you take into account how many of the old grandmasters of jujitsu, judo, karate, and aikido also trained with the staff, spear, sword, or other forms of weaponry.  In most the various styles of kung fu, or wushu, as others would want it to be called, those students who have advanced to a certain level of proficiency are then taught techniques with weapons.  It would indeed seem that weapons training is necessary for mastery.

Eskrima may adopt a reverse methodology from other martial arts by introducing weapons first and teaching empty hand techniques later but the principle still applies that weapons training complements and improves one’s effectiveness in empty hand techniques.

For one, this is because those who have trained and who do use weapons know more fully the dangers of being attacked with such weapons, what a skilled practitioner may accomplish with them, and also what to do to evade them or minimize the harm they may cause.

Also, most weapons travel faster than the hand.  And so, someone who has trained with weapons is better able to keep track of his opponent’s movements and has a better chance of evading or countering an attack, more so when the attacker is unarmed.

Even more important than the foregoing is how eskrima conditions the eskrimador. 
It is the stick handling in eskrima which trains, prepares, and teaches the practitioner the necessary quickness of action, proper strength of grip, flexibility of the wrist, and the torque necessary for the empty hand applications of wrist locking and grappling.

Further, the techniques of striking, thrusting, and blocking with either stick, sword, or knife may be readily interpolated into empty hand strikes, punches, parries, blocks, and breaking.

Because the eskrima practitioner is trained not only to strike with force but also to hold the stick tightly enough so that it does not fly from his hand but also lightly enough so as not to restrict his own movement, the practitioner, though unaware, is trained how to apply sufficient force in restraining or trapping the opponent’s hands.  In empty hand fighting, this sensitivity then becomes reflex or second nature to the eskrimador.


Eskrima may begin with teaching one how to use weapons, but the supreme mastery of it is still, and always, towards how to use one’s empty hands as weapons.